Are Judicial Rules Strict Enough on Ex Parte Contact?

March 13, 2015
The Legal Intelligencer

Types : In the News

In the wake of the state’s Judicial Conduct Board filing charges against three Philadelphia Municipal Court judges over their alleged roles in case-fixing, legal observers were divided on whether the problem of ex parte contact between judges was frequent enough to merit tougher ethics rules.

On Wednesday, Municipal Court Judges Dawn Segal and Joseph J. O’Neill and former Judge Joseph Waters were charged for their alleged roles in fixing cases for campaign donors of Waters.


Ethics attorney Michael B. Hayes of Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads said judges are not totally prohibited from speaking to one another about cases.

Hayes said neither the old code of conduct or the new one, implemented last year, prohibits judges “from consulting with each other appropriately, whether to provide mentorship, information or insight into an area of the law, or other professional guidance.”

To view the full article, please click here.


Professional Responsibility

Montgomery McCracken’s Professional Responsibility Practice provides experienced and skilled representation of attorneys before the Disciplinary Board of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and its Hearing Committees. With the recent advent of discipline on […]

Learn more about our Professional Responsibility Practice


Montgomery McCracken’s Litigation Department offers a deep bench of skilled and experienced litigators whose practice areas encompass a broad array of industries and substantive legal disciplines.  Our clients include individuals, […]

Learn more about our Litigation Department

1 of 2