Service

Antitrust

Montgomery McCracken’s Antitrust Practice encompasses the full breadth of issues that arise in criminal and civil antitrust litigation, with special talents in multidistrict and class action litigation.

We have played a leading role for clients in antitrust litigation throughout the country, since its representation of significant defendants in Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Co. and the Electrical Equipment cases in the 1960s. We represent clients as plaintiffs as well as defendants.

We counsel clients on antitrust issues in business transactions such as:

  • Government investigation responses
  • Mergers and acquisitions
  • Distribution arrangements
  • Licensing agreements
  • Sales and pricing policies
  • Healthcare
  • Trade association activities
  • Intellectual property

We maintain exceptional relations with the enforcement agencies in Washington and Philadelphia. We have achieved significant successes for our antitrust clients in settling difficult and potentially dangerous cases because of our reputation for quality and integrity in dealing with both opposing counsel and co-counsel. When litigation becomes necessary, we are committed and effective advocates.

Our Antitrust Practice seeks to develop partnering relationships with our clients, both long-term and short-term, to serve their needs and objectives most effectively.

Experience:

Representative Matters
  • A major worldwide video game platform in two antitrust class actions currently underway.
  • A nationwide firm providing card payment services and point-of-sale software to merchants.
  • A major U.S. airline in the Foreign Travel Agency Antitrust Class Action Litigation.
  • A large Japanese chemical company in the microcrystalline/cellulose (“MCC”) Antitrust Class Action Litigation.
  • The largest graphite electrodes producer in the Graphite Electrodes Antitrust Class Action Litigation against all of the world’s producers, which may lead to claims of international price fixing and market allocation.
  • A major magazine publisher in the Magazine Publishers Antitrust Class Action Litigation, which alleged price fixing by the nation’s largest magazine publishers.
  • A major Canadian manufacturing company in an antitrust/patent suit brought by a competitor involving the water purification industry.
  • A major paper manufacturer in the Linerboard Antitrust Class Action Litigation involving allegations of price fixing by all industry members.
  • An electronic article surveillance manufacturer in antitrust litigation against a trade association and certain recording labels.
  • A cable company in antitrust litigation involving access to broadcasting towers.
  • A significant software producer in a series of state antitrust cases involving class action certification matters.
  • A carpet manufacturer in a U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division Grand Jury Investigation involving allegations of industry price-fixing.
  • A major paper manufacturer in U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division Grand Jury Investigation involving allegations of industry price-fixing.

Contact Us