Robert E. Day

Partner

Office
Philadelphia
Phone
215-772-7507
View All Attorneys
Robert E. Day

Overview

Robert (“Rob”) Day defends companies against class actions and mass arbitrations in state and federal courts and arbitral forums around the country. A partner in the Litigation Department and chair of Montgomery McCracken’s Class Action Practice, Rob has defended Fortune 500 companies and small businesses alike in industries including tech, manufacturing, spirits and retail against antitrust, consumer protection, RESPA and FACTA claims.

Rob represents companies in arbitration and advises them on arbitration law issues, with a particular focus in recent years on mass arbitration defense. An experienced appellate advocate, Rob has represented clients before Pennsylvania’s intermediate appellate court and Supreme Court, the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third and Fifth Circuits, and on petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, and has argued before the Third and Fifth Circuits. Before joining the firm, he clerked for the Honorable Edith Clement of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the Honorable Mitchel E. Ostrer of the New Jersey Appellate Division.

In Depth

Robert Day is a partner in Montgomery McCracken’s Litigation Department and serves as chair of the firm's Class Action Practice. He has litigated complex legal issues in state and federal courts around the country, with a particular focus on class action defense. Rob has represented clients on appeals before both the intermediate and Supreme Court in Pennsylvania, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second, Third, and Fifth Circuits, and on petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. Rob has presented oral argument before the Third and Fifth Circuits. Rob also has extensive experience representing companies in arbitration and advising them on arbitration law issues—especially, in recent years, mass arbitration defense.

Rob has defended major players (including Fortune 500 companies) and small businesses alike from a diverse array of industries—including tech, manufacturing, spirits, and retail—facing an equally diverse array of legal claims. In his class action defense practice, he has defended companies against antitrust, consumer protection, Real Estate Settlement Practices Act (“RESPA”), and Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”) claims (among others). His appellate work has tackled a similarly diverse array of legal issues, including First Amendment, antitrust law, maritime law, and Federal Tort Claims Act claims.

Rob contributes regularly to the firm’s thought leadership, publishing articles that focus on issues related to class action defense and arbitration.

Prior to joining Montgomery McCracken, Rob was a law clerk for the Honorable Edith Clement on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans, LA. He also clerked for the Honorable Mitchel E. Ostrer on the New Jersey Appellate Division.

Robert earned his J.D. degree from University of Pennsylvania School of Law, where he served as the Articles Editor for the University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law and was a member of the Supreme Court Clinic, participating in merits briefing before the United States Supreme Court. He also received a Certificate in Business from the Wharton School. Prior to attending law school, Robert received his A.B. degree in Philosophy from Princeton University and a Master’s in Religion from Westminster Theological Seminary.

How Robert Helps

  • Class action defense
  • Mass arbitration defense
  • Antitrust and consumer protection class actions
  • Motions to compel arbitration and arbitration law counseling
  • State and federal appeals
  • Commercial arbitration and business disputes

The Record

Credentials

  • New Jersey
  • Pennsylvania
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  • United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
  • United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
  • United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Insights

Shared Thinking

View All Insights
In the News · October 2026 Batching A Growing Response To Mass Wage Arbitrations Workers have responded to employers' arbitration requirements in wage and hour disputes by filing thousands of simultaneous arbitration demands, and now employers are rewriting pacts so that only… Read More Press Releases · August 2026 29 Montgomery McCracken Attorneys Listed in the 2027 Edition of Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America Montgomery McCracken is pleased to announce that 29 of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized in the 2027 edition of Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in… Read More Alerts · June 2026 The Chilutti Test Returns: The Pennsylvania Superior Court Again Adopts Heightened Scrutiny of Online Arbitration Agreements When the Pennsylvania Supreme Court vacated the Superior Court’s en banc decision in Chilutti v. Uber Technologies, Inc., businesses may have hoped that Pennsylvania’s unusually strict approach to… Read More Alerts · February 2026 Vacated But Not Forgotten: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Leaves the Future of Online Arbitration Agreements in Pennsylvania Unresolved For those waiting to see whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would clarify the law on consumer assent to online arbitration agreements in Chilutti v. Uber Technologies, Inc., its… Read More Press Releases · August 2025 24 Montgomery McCracken Attorneys Listed in the 2026 Editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America Montgomery McCracken is pleased to announce that 24 of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized in the 2026 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones… Read More Bylined Articles · May 2025 How Mass Arbitration Defense Strategies Have Fared In Court On Feb. 24, clothing retailer Janie & Jack LLC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to enjoin 2,408 individual consumers… Read More

Talk With Robert

Philadelphia 215-772-7507 rday@mmwr.com